<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Comparison on OpenChain KWG</title><link>https://korea-wg.openchainproject.org/en/tags/comparison/</link><description>Recent content in Comparison on OpenChain KWG</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://korea-wg.openchainproject.org/en/tags/comparison/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ISO/IEC 5230 vs 18974 Comparison</title><link>https://korea-wg.openchainproject.org/en/guide/iso18974_guide/compare/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://korea-wg.openchainproject.org/en/guide/iso18974_guide/compare/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="1-relationship-between-the-two-standards"&gt;1. Relationship Between the Two Standards&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;ISO/IEC 5230 and ISO/IEC 18974 are both international open source standards led by the OpenChain Project, but they address different problems. 5230 covers open source license compliance (fulfillment of copyright obligations, SBOM management, and distribution of Compliance Artifacts), while 18974 covers open source security assurance (vulnerability detection, assessment, response, and CVD). The two standards do not have a complete superset/subset relationship. They share 9 common clauses covering policy, competence, SBOM, and similar areas, but each has its own exclusive clauses — 5230 has clauses for license compliance, artifacts, and contributions, while 18974 has clauses for Standard Practice Implementation and Security Assurance.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>